Jump to content
FORUM IS CURRENTLY BEING UPGRADED, PLEASE BEAR WITH US. ×

The SPL Thread


Nicolas

Recommended Posts

do you honestly think the likes of bolton blackburn blackpool etc are better than celtic & the huns with our curreent team i think we'd finish in the top half in the prem & if us & the huns were in the prem we'd be top 4 teams in a few yr i think with the sky money big stadiums fan base & big deby we'd attract the best players but thats my opinion of course any back on topic do you think carlos will accept a big paycut the huns will pay him 20k p.w tops as there skint hopefully he stays

i think the teams that went down would beat Celtic and Rnagers. Even teams like Cardiff, Southampton, lesta etc would prob beat you imo

<a class='bbc_url' href='http://www.avillafan.com'><img src='http://www.avillafan.com/forum/predictionleague/Carlingcup.png' alt='Posted Image' class='bbc_img' /></a>

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

me again :)

Rangers and Celtic would survive quite comfortably in the EPL but wouldnt be top half for a while. In a couple of seasons though with the huge fan bases we both have along with the additional TV money, sponsorships etc etc we'd both be pushing for European places

avillafanrangersbadges.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just laugh there rangersfan

controversial.png

When I was just a little boy i asked my mother what shall i beee.

Shall i be villa shall i be blues, Here's what she said to me......

YOU KNOW THE REST

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just laugh there rangersfan

I bet you dont even watch scottish football

Rangers and Celtic have 10x more fans than you lot and Rangers had the 3rd highest average attendance in Britain 2 seasons ago (dont know what the stats were for last year but would be similar). These attendances are playing in the SPL and would be even higher playing against Man Utd, Chelsea etc every other week.

If we both had the same amount of money, both played in the EPL, do you think top players would rather play infront of 25-30k fans a week with very little history or celtic and rangers who have both won European trophies with Celtic the first british team to win the European Cup (unfortunately) in front of 50,000 fans. Rangers with 115 trophies bagged also?

OK then...

avillafanrangersbadges.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet you dont even watch scottish football

Rangers and Celtic have 10x more fans than you lot and Rangers had the 3rd highest average attendance in Britain 2 seasons ago (dont know what the stats were for last year but would be similar). These attendances are playing in the SPL and would be even higher playing against Man Utd, Chelsea etc every other week.

If we both had the same amount of money, both played in the EPL, do you think top players would rather play infront of 25-30k fans a week with very little history or celtic and rangers who have both won European trophies with Celtic the first british team to win the European Cup (unfortunately) in front of 50,000 fans. Rangers with 115 trophies bagged also?

OK then...

I'm beginning to hate your ass to be honest. The parts in bald is utter nutsack and quite frankly an insult to us all.

You have a bigger stadium congrats, so do Newcastle but Citeh are better than them with no history.....

It's a 42,788 seater and we usually get 38,000 fans or so. To say we have very little history is p*ss poor knowledge.

3188055002_02c9077637holte.jpg

Aston Villa Football Club EST. 1874

The Bells Are Ringing

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet you dont even watch scottish football

Rangers and Celtic have 10x more fans than you lot and Rangers had the 3rd highest average attendance in Britain 2 seasons ago (dont know what the stats were for last year but would be similar). These attendances are playing in the SPL and would be even higher playing against Man Utd, Chelsea etc every other week.

If we both had the same amount of money, both played in the EPL, do you think top players would rather play infront of 25-30k fans a week with very little history or celtic and rangers who have both won European trophies with Celtic the first british team to win the European Cup (unfortunately) in front of 50,000 fans. Rangers with 115 trophies bagged also?

OK then...

Yeah that would be down to the fact that there is really only two teams in Scotland, Celtic and Rangers you basically have the monopoly of the division you are in and the other sides competing in that league are about the standard of League two football clubs if that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I bet you dont even watch scottish football

Rangers and Celtic have 10x more fans than you lot and Rangers had the 3rd highest average attendance in Britain 2 seasons ago (dont know what the stats were for last year but would be similar). These attendances are playing in the SPL and would be even higher playing against Man Utd, Chelsea etc every other week.

If we both had the same amount of money, both played in the EPL, do you think top players would rather play infront of 25-30k fans a week with very little history or celtic and rangers who have both won European trophies with Celtic the first british team to win the European Cup (unfortunately) in front of 50,000 fans. Rangers with 115 trophies bagged also?

OK then...

Thats all maybes but at this time celtic and rangers are playing in a micky mouse league which no one wants to watch and yes i have watched the league and its p*ss poor with very low quality plus celtic, rangers would be championship level if that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm beginning to hate your ass to be honest. The parts in bald is utter nutsack and quite frankly an insult to us all.

You have a bigger stadium congrats, so do Newcastle but Citeh are better than them with no history.....

It's a 42,788 seater and we usually get 38,000 fans or so. To say we have very little history is p*ss poor knowledge.

well your comments are an insult to the old firm. 50k beats 38k anyway and facts are facts, rangers and celtic do have better history than Aston Villa. Not looking for a fight, just stating facts. All other EPL clubs fans would agree.

I'm not saying that Rangers are better than Villa but if we went to the premier league, with our fanbase, history and added investment we probably would be.

avillafanrangersbadges.jpg
Link to post
Share on other sites

well your comments are an insult to the old firm. 50k beats 38k anyway and facts are facts, rangers and celtic do have better history than Aston Villa. Not looking for a fight, just stating facts. All other EPL clubs fans would agree.

I'm not saying that Rangers are better than Villa but if we went to the premier league, with our fanbase, history and added investment we probably would be.

There are more than 2 teams in the EPL, hence the fan divides. There are 2 teams in Scotland...more successful? In what exactly Scottish cups? I respected Scottish football a few pages back saying you'd fit into the premier league so I'm not bitter, but the way you go about posting your trollocks on here isn't acceptable. It's egging people on to bite back.

Sorry Loyal....soooo Cuellar :whistling:

3188055002_02c9077637holte.jpg

Aston Villa Football Club EST. 1874

The Bells Are Ringing

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...